Ruling Details
The state Supreme Court reversed Moentmann's ruling, saying that the requests for the injunction and declaration were moot because the state had not continued to fund family planning programs. Chief Justice Michael Wolff, writing for the majority, said the Missouri and St. Louis affiliates' grants could not be canceled because the health department director had authority to enter into them under the budget laws. In addition, evidence did not show that Planned Parenthood had acted inappropriately but rather that the organization actually took many steps to adhere to the contract's stipulations, Wolff wrote. "In these circumstances, the government cannot accept the benefits of the contracts and retain those benefits, while also recovering the consideration paid," according to Wolff's opinion. The dissenting judges said that the contracts should have been voided and that the state should be reimbursed because the Missouri and St. Louis affiliate received them in violation of the budget laws. Judge Stephen Limbaugh in his dissenting opinion, wrote, "In short, the (health department) director had no authority to enter into the contracts with Planned Parenthood ... because the defendants were too intertwined with their abortion providers, and, consequently, they were not eligible for funding under the appropriations statute."
Reaction
Paula Gianinio, president and CEO of PPSLR, said, "We're obviously just thrilled, grateful, relieved with today's decision ... and really feel very vindicated with the court saying there was no indication of any kind of fraud by Planned Parenthood. ... We did what was asked of us." Gov. Matt Blunt (R) said the decision "undermines the Legislature's ability to spend tax dollars in accord with the values of Missourians." Shipley said that he was disappointed that the Missouri and St. Louis affiliates did not have to reimburse the state and that the Supreme Court did not say whether Planned Parenthood affiliates are eligible for family planning funds. He added, "So basically, if the department of health chooses to do what they want, and the state attorney general does not proceed to recover the moneys that were inappropriately distributed, then the citizens of the state have no avenue to seek compensation or reimbursement" (AP/Kansas City Star, 8/8).
"Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment